• KCI(Korea Citation Index)
  • DOI(CrossRef)
  • DOI(CrossCheck)

The Korean Journal of Community Living Science

ISSN : 1229-8565 (Print) / 2287-5190 (Online)

  • KCI(Korea Citation Index)
  • DOI(CrossRef)
  • DOI(CrossCheck)

The Korean Journal of Community Living Science

ISSN : 1229-8565 (Print) / 2287-5190 (Online)

Manuscript Submission Form

Inward correspondence: Editor in chief of The Korean Society of Community Living Science

  • Title of Manuscript :
  • Corresponding author’s name and affiliation:
    • Address:
    • Tel:
    • Mobile Phone:
    • E-mail:

Date of submission: year __________, month _________, day __________

Author(s) submit(s) the manuscript to The Korean Journal of Community Living Science and want(s) a review. The manuscript was written in accordance with the criteria below. Please contact corresponding author(s) if there are any more questions.

◎ Review criteria and author checklist:

∘ Does this manuscript coincide with the aims and scope of The Korean Journal of Community Living Science? ( )
∘ Is this manuscript an original research article? ( )
∘ Does this manuscript follow the instructions to author? ( )
- Does this manuscript have the mark of the corresponding author? ( )
- Does this manuscript have the key words in the abstract? ( )
- Is this manuscript arranged in order of Abstract, Introduction, Study Methods(or Materials and Methods), Results and Discussion, Summary and Conclusion, and References? ( )
- Do citations in the text section coincide with the instructions to author? ( )
- Does the list of references coincide with the instructions to author? ( )
∘ Does the title of this manuscript coincide with the contents of the research? ( )
∘ Is conclusion described reasonably and logically? ( )
∘ Is the purpose of the research described appropriately? ( )
∘ Does this research contribute to the advancement of studies in this research area? ( )
∘ Do the study methods coincide with the purpose of the research? ( )
∘ Are the statistical analyses for the data applied properly? ( )
∘ Are all tables and figures described in English? ( )
∘ Are there any mistakes in facts and/or numbers? ( )
∘ Are important technical terms used properly in this manuscript? ( )
∘ Is the conclusion and argument derived from concrete results and/or evidence? ( )
∘ Does the abstract coincide with the contents of the research? ( )
∘ Is the English abstract written correctly? ( )